The capacity to generate novel perspectives, ideas, and solutions is creativity. It is essential in a lot of areas of life, like art, science, business, and personal development.(Thinkers)

A recent study found that even people who tend to think in a traditional way, like accountants and insurance adjusters, can be creative if they can look at difficult situations from a different angle.

Using this method, you try to see a situation through a different set of emotional eyes, like trying to see something that normally makes you angry as positive or neutral.

Lily Zhu, the study’s lead author and an assistant professor at the Carson College of Business at Washington State University, stated, “One of the study’s implications is that creativity is not something that is only accessible to people we think of as creatives.” There is a creative component whenever we attempt to think differently from our initial reaction and break away from our existing perspective. That flexible-thinking muscle can help us become more creative over time if we practice or train it.

Zhu and his co-authors from the University of California, Irvine, Chris Bauman and Maia Young, carried out a survey and two similar experiments on three distinct groups of people for the study.

The first survey of 279 college students found that people who were more creative and open to new ideas were more likely to regularly engage in emotional reappraisal.

After watching the movie, the people who took part were asked to think of a way to use a space in their building that was left by a closed cafeteria.

Instead of watching a movie, the next experiment had a different group of 177 participants write about an experience that made them angry. Then, they had to write about it again from a different emotional point of view or write about something else to distract them.

Participants with conventional thinking who tried emotional reappraisal came up with more innovative ideas than conventional thinking participants who used suppression, distraction, or no emotional regulation strategy at all in either of the two experiments.

Notably, participants who were initially thought to be creative Thinkers did not appear to benefit significantly from emotional reappraisal.

According to the authors, doing more emotional reappraisal doesn’t have as much of an effect as adding more gas to a car that already has fuel because creative people already tend to do so on a regular basis.

Zhu suggested that supervisors create training to help employees develop their creative Thinkers abilities.

When confronted with a challenge or crisis, individuals can instead practice emotional reappraisal rather than suppressing negative feelings.

Zhu stated, “Negative emotions are unavoidable in the workplace.” The question is not whether or not we want negative emotions. The inquiry is: How can we handle them in a more effective and healthy.

Public by world news spot live


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here